• Home
  • About
  • Authors
  • Contact
  • Services

Iowa Employer Law Blog: Insights on Recent Developments in Employment & Labor Law

From Dickinson's Employment Law Attorneys in Des Moines, Iowa

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« 2011 Iowa ESGR Lunch and Learn Workshop Announced
DOL Issues/Seeks Guidance on Requirement That Employers Provide Reasonable Break Time for an Employee to Express Breast Milk »

Too Hot v. Not: The Rest of the Story

December 22, 2010 by Dickinson Employment and Labor Law Group

- Posted by Bridget R. Penick

Since we discussed Lewis v. Heartland Inns of America, L.L.C., et al. No. 083860 (8th Circuit, January 21, 2010) in some detail in a previous blog post and at our Employment Law Client Seminar in October, we want to give you the “rest of the story.”  Brenna Lewis sued Heartland Inn, claiming discrimination based on sexual stereotypes and also claiming retaliation.  Lewis, who had an “Ellen Degeneres kind of look,” was replaced by a woman who dressed more femininely and had a “Midwestern girl look.”  She was fired after she complained about the comments, among other things.  The district court had granted summary judgment in favor of Heartland Inn, but the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case to the district court to proceed to trial.  In its Order, the court reasoned:

an employer who discriminates against women because . . . they do not wear dresses or makeup, is engaging in sex discrimination because the discrimination would not occur but for the victim’s sex.

Trial was held in federal court for five days in November in the Southern District of Iowa (Des Moines).  The jury rejected Lewis’s claim of sex stereotyping, but found in favor of Lewis on her retaliation claim, awarding $1,800 in lost wages, $19,000 in emotional distress, and $30,000 in punitive damages.  Plaintiff is also entitled to an award of attorney fees and costs, and has requested the court award $136,000 in attorney fees and $13,350 in costs. The judge has not yet ruled on the motion.

The outcome of this case exemplifies what we have told Iowa employers repeatedly: even if the underlying claim is without merit, there is great risk of a retaliation claim succeeding if employee complaints of discrimination or harassment are not handled properly.  To avoid retaliation claims, Iowa employers are encouraged to contact their employment law attorneys when responding to workplace complaints of discrimination or harassment.

If you have questions about handling workplace discrimination or harassment claims or avoiding retaliation claims, please contact attorney Bridget Penick at 515-246-4545 / bpenick@dickinsonlaw.com, or another member of the firm’s Iowa Employment and Labor Law Group at employmentlaw@dickinsonlaw.com.

Share

Share this:

  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Posted in Case Law, Court of Appeals, Discrimination, Harassment, Iowa Courts, Retaliation, Termination, Uncategorized | Tagged avoid retaliation claims, Brenna Lewis, Lewis v. Heartland Inns of America, Retaliation, sex discrimination, sex stereotyping, sexual stereotypes |

  • search blog

  • categories

  • rss feed

    RSS Feed RSS - Posts

    RSS Feed RSS - Comments

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 43 other followers

  • suggested blogs & sites

    • AL Employment Law Report
    • CT Employment Law Blog
    • DE Employment Law Blog
    • Employment Law Monitor
    • IA Civil Rights Commission
    • IA Workforce Development
    • Nat'l Labor Relations Board
    • NY Labor & Employment Law
    • Social Networking Law Blog
    • U.S. Department of Labor
    • United States EEOC
    • VA Workplace Law Blog
  • disclaimer

    This blog is made available by the law firm of Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C. for educational purposes only. It is intended to provide general information and a general understanding of the law, but not specific legal advice. This blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

    Use of this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C. or any of its attorneys. The content of this blog is not an advertisement for legal services, nor is it an invitation to form an attorney-client relationship.

    Statements made in this blog are the viewpoints of the individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C. or any of its clients. Additionally, Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C. is not responsible for content on other websites and blogs to which this blog links.

    Although this blog may address certain tax issues, it is not intended to constitute a reliance opinion as described in IRS Circular 230 and, therefore, cannot be relied upon by itself to avoid any tax penalties.

  • copyright notice

    © Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C. and Iowa Employer Law Blog, 2010. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C. and the Iowa Employer Law Blog with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: Customized MistyLook by Sadish.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 43 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com